Different Emails for Different Users, Usage. Facebook Demonstrates

When done effectively and appropriately - email is a marketer's most powerful retention tool. Here is an example from Facebook that demonstrates both effective and appropriate email marketing. The key: deliver different emails to different users / user patterns. Conceptually, its very basic. In practice, it's actually quite hard to deliver relevant emails, at the right frequencies, and featuring the right products (why? creation and delivery can be difficult - but featuring content that is appropriate for that user is the real challenge).

Here are two emails that I have never received because I am an overly active Facebook user. The recipients here are less involved so Facebook delivers too different types of emails:

1. You Have Notifications Pending!

The goal is clearly to drive logins by demonstrating that the user's network / profile has activity. If a user logins daily, notifications are prominently featured across the header... this is an attempt to enforce that habit.

2. You Have a Birthday this Week!

Again, for users who login daily, this is prominently featured. Birthdays are important drivers of engagement - ie posts, messages, events, JibJab cards =) For early users, this is a compelling email that gives me an immediate action. For more active users, this could be overwhelming and Facebook is probably better served promoting deeper interactions like messages and/or new features.

What's this mean for you? Segmenting your communication is a powerful way to drive engagement / retention and guide users through your product. To do it effectively, you also need to determine what products and communications make most sense for each segment / class of user.

Word With Friends User Onboarding

I've written about the importance of using user-segmentation to deliver unique user / site experiences and email marketing. Here's a brilliant example of Zynga's Word With Friends (the mega-popular Facebook & mobile Scrabble game).

Obviously the game is predicated on multiple users playing... and that obviously starts with an invitation process. Words With Friends users your Facebook / Twitter networks to create an address book of friends playing the game. The first people in your address book are new users (with big, prominent NEW badges next to their name). It's a super simple, basic concept - but it's brilliant because Zynga knows that:

- new users need to be prompted to play - once they play a couple games, they are hooked - current users feel a sense of goodwill / obligation to play with newly joined friends - current users likely play within the same confined network... this broadens that

Small UI placement that makes an important difference.

Groupon's Post Purchase Prompts. As "In the River" as it Gets.

Great example of "in the river" promotion by Groupon (one of the very best at conversions and promotions). It doesn't more "in the river" than the post-purchase screen... and it doesn't distract the user during the purchase / flow. This is an obvious example but worth showing because it's clean, clear and intentionally unavoidable. Immediately post purchase:

- the screen blooms into a popup with three components

- a lightweight receipt highlighting the coupon's expiration date (important)

- a chance for users to share their purchase and receive a $10 credit (Twitter, Email, Facebook, Facebook messages). I believe it's better to promote this post purchase because you can be more aggressive (even obnoxious) about it and not interrupt the conversion

- three more deals relevant to you (as determined by sales popularity and proximity)

Also worth noting: it is far easier to A/B test and optimize these flows than it is on the purchase / check-out page. Once you've optimized this flow, you can apply those findings elsewhere.

Twitter In Line Friend Suggestions - Chance to Expand for Brands? Charge?

Most of my Twitter usage is through mobile (as I suspect is the case for many). So excuse me if this is old news When you follow someone on Twitter, it immediately expands to reveal others "you might also want to follow". It is directly in-line, relevant and surely drives deeper usage / engagement. It makes sense both for the person following and the person tweeting (another avenue to drive attention & grow the following). It could also be another avenue to help onboard / better engage big brands. Earlier I wrote a post about ESPN's Twitter usage (My Response to Mark Cuban’s: Does ESPN.com Have a Twitter Problem?) - this seems like a big lever for ESPN, ESPN fans and consequently Twitter.

Upon following an ESPN personality / handle (either as defined by Twitter's search algorithm or a verified account), it could prompt some sort of walk-through that better connects other ESPN personalities. Right now it is very difficult to follow the right people - and that's partially ESPN's fault and partially Twitter's.

Users wouldn't find it intrusive - and in fact, they would probably appreciate it. Brands would absolutely appreciate the chance to promote related handles (right now they create background graphics to do so). And Twitter would get more deeply engaged users, with bigger follow lists and more engaged brands (with greater followings).

In fact, the brands would likely pay on a per-action / promotion basis. For instance, as Polaris Ventures, we have several people with Twitter accounts, a master account and a Dogpatch Labs account. I'd gladly work to better connect those - and if that came at a reasonable fee, I'd gladly sign up.

For a bigger brand like ESPN, it's clearly for more powerful and therefor more valuable....

Google Adds Persistent Header, Footer to New Gmail Theme.

Persistent headers / footers have become common, hip design treatments. It of course makes sense: actionable links / content follow you throughout the page... so better navigation is always nearby & easy. If you're unfamiliar with persistent headers / footers (what I refer to them as) - they are 'toolbars' that stick to the page as you scroll. So when you begin moving down, the header sticks and usually has key navigational links and/or content on it. As an example, check out ESPN's scoreboards (here) - ESPN launched it early on and I raved about it.

Google is now applying the persistent header and footer to GMail. It's an interesting way to implement it because they have moved the core functions for the inbox and the individual message to the persistent header (archive, reply, forward, etc). And they have moved a new horizontal ad unit to the persistent footer (again, both inbox and message).

iOS5: Apple's Web 'Reader' is Awesome. But Also a Trojan Horse for Ads?

It's been a year of chess moves between Google, Apple, Facebook and Twitter. For example, look at the last few weeks alone:- Google+ launches as Google's social effort (and its good) - iOS5 is announced with Twitter as a key integration - Facebook is rumored to be working on an HTML5 app store of sorts And is this yet another? One of iOS5's little-discussed features is the web "Reader" tool. When clicked, it converts a webpage to an optimized, stripped page for easier reading... think iBooks for the web. It's great and I find myself using it all the time.

The obvious thought is that it is a way to better integrate the web with iBooks and iTunes. But the next thought is: this is a way to boost iAds throughout the mobile web. They have stripped everything but the text / images and have created a clean reading experience with plenty of room for ad units. Strikes me as another chess move... this time directed at Google and Facebook's ad businesses.

regular page:

and using Reader:

Remember The Call to Action & Importance of Context.

Facebook Ads are becoming more and more Sponsored Stories - effectively friend-endorsed Facebook Pages or Posts. I love the concept (friends vouching for a particular brand, discussions, offer, etc). The ad units are enjoyably familiar (only appear if friends support it) but lack calls to action. Here is a good example - an ad surrounded by people I know and for a page that is relevant to me (golfing):

But what's the call to action? Visiting the page? That is strikingly un-Facebook... in fact, it seems more AdWords-like. Where is the integrated Like and Share buttons? And where is the language to at least give context to Feherty is (other than something my friends like)?

It is a reminder to set context and create actionable units / content. While this specifically applies to ad units, it is a relevant reminder for all product, content, etc.

8/10, 15/25 Top Grossing iPhone Apps are Freemium.

I like to check in on Apple's top grossing applications - it's a good indication of mobile app and publisher trends. And from time to time, I have written about those trends. ... and here is a relatively important trend: each of the current top iPhone apps is freemium (">we've seen hints of this in the past, but never to this degree). Eight of the ten top grossing apps are free and fifteen of the top twenty-five. These come from a variety of publishers and are almost entirely games - only one app is not a game (#21 iMuscle is a health related app - $1.99).

This is a natural evolution of improved game mechanics and better in-app purchasing flows.... both lead to more effective premium upgrades / monetization while preserving iTune's distribution potential. For example: In January 2010, only three of the twenty-five top grossing apps had in-app purchasing enabled. Now, most of the top-grossing apps are distributed as free downloads and monetize in-application.

JetSetter's Search Box Promotion

I like the highlight examples of effective "in the river" marketing - the concept of placing product, promotion and marketing messages in relevant, active parts of the web experience. Lots of examples here... Here is another example from Gilt Group's JetSetter (which is one of the better designed and visually appealing websites).

The fundamental JetSetter experience is browsing really compelling, great-looking travel offers. Even with no intention of planning travel, I can waste dozens of clicks browsing JetSetter's delicious offers.

And while browse is JetSetter's primary experience, they are trying to drive search activity and have introduced both a search box and top searches. This is an obvious revelation because JetSetter overlays the message (along with today's top search) atop today's offer. It is bold, colorful and extends onto the offer and the right navigation pane. It also fades in (quickly and lightly) - in the rare case that you missed the unit.

On a side note: the "top searches" concept is interesting because it creates another browse + search experience that, in my opinion, is more shop-able. I believe that most significant travel (cost, distance, time) is *not* booked spontaneously... so the ability to search JetSetter deals for specific locations makes JetSetter more usable.... while still keeping the brand and web-experience in-tact.