beRecruited Featured in Today's Wall Street Journal

beRecruited is prominently featured in today's Wall Street Journal article, "The Do-It-Yourself Scholarship", which graces the cover of the Personal Section. Author Matthew Futterman gives a thorough overview of collegiate sports recruiting and how the internet has made the process more effective and efficient for athletes and college coaches. Specifically, Futterman profiles the landscape of "recruiting marketers" ($1,000-$5,000 per athlete) and how services like beRecruited are reaching greater scale.

Kirsten Bladek had a problem.

Three weeks into her senior season on the Monarch High School volleyball team in Colorado, the 5-feet, 10-inch setter found herself warming the bench. Her dream of an athletic scholarship seemed dead -- especially since her family couldn't afford the $1,000 or so that many parents pay these days to hire a private athletic-recruiting counselor.

But then in September, Ms. Bladek spent $39.99 to post her athletic résumé and pictures of her playing on the Web site beRecruited.com. The shots, combined with videos posted later, highlighted her ability to set the ball from in front of her forehead, with arms thrust out like Superman in flight. That display, combined with some telephone campaigning by Kirsten and her mother, got college coaches to start paying attention.

"I've been getting so many calls from random numbers, half of them I'm scared to pick up," says Kirsten, who recently took an all-expenses-paid visit to New Mexico Highlands University, where she was offered a scholarship.

Ms. Bladek's experience highlights the changing landscape of athletic scholarships. Coaches and recruiters easily notice top-tier talent in big-name sports.

Homepage Advertising: Wall Street Journal & Boston.com

I've recently spent a lot of time on Boston.com tracking Red Sox free agency rumors. I've been very impressed with Boston.com's revamped sports section and blogging efforts (the best I've seen for online newspaper sources) - but I have also been struck by the advertising on their homepage... which is rather untraditional compared to other branded, highly trafficked websites. I've written about aggressive branded campaigns before - using the New York Post as an example. Boston.com takes the opposite strategy: lots of varied ad-sizes scattered throughout the page.

Take a look at a screenshot from Boston.com and the Wall Street Journal below. Boston.com has two 180x90s beside their logo, two 235x60s on the left column and a 300x250 on the right. Honestly, there isn't much room for content between all the various units. The Wall Street Journal however, has two matching, rich-media units and a smaller banner in the header promoting WSJ subscriptions. The WSJ screenshot is poor because it doesn't capture the full horizontal ad-unit (it's being collapsed).

In the long run, I imagine that the Wall Street Journal is most effective for the brands... and consequently for the publisher. It's certainly the better user-experience. Fill rate for those integrated, rich campaigns are likely below 100% - and that's perhaps when the Boston.com strategy is best served: as filler.

Boston.com Homepage

Wall Street Journal Homepage

Google Image Search: Now with Text Ads. Ugh.

Much has been made of Google's willingness - and now need considering the economic downturn - to monetize Google Images search. Google has even suggested that it may mean an incremental $200 million.

But they've been cautious to add AdWords to Image search - perhaps because it is a difficult balance between matching user intent and relevancy....

Until today - the first day I noticed prominent ads within image search. I don't believe that this implementation is effective - and certainly not capable of generating $200m. The trouble is that it does a poor job of matching ads with what the user is looking for: imagery. Even if the ads are interesting - my eye immediately seeks graphics... because that is my clear, stated intent.

Google has graphic inventory to leverage - from AdWords to DoubleClick to Froogle. There has to be a better solution.

Google Images with Ads Google Images AdWords AdSense

Three Reasons Facebook Doesn't Work for Brands

If I was unsurprised that P&G was struggling to advertise on Facebook, 247WallStreet was convinced. Their reaction to the New York Times piece illustrating the struggles of Facebook-based brand campaigns was... And?! And they provide three completely logical explanations as to why Facebook campaigns aren't working:

1. Intent. 'The Google advertising model works because the user is "in on it".'

2. Socializing isn't bred for advertising. "The dirty little secret is that social networks are the playgrounds of people who do not want to be disturbed as they wander a self-centered universe."

3. Relevance. The Facebook ad system is neither relevant nor meaningful:

Anyone coming to Facebook and putting Obama's name in gets a list of sites, with his campaign's being at the top of the list. Off to the right is a text ad which is supposed to be appropriately placed to get maximum exposure. It reads "Barack Obama's IQ = 136, Can you Beat his Score? Take our 2 minute IQ test." In other words, there is nothing appropriate or relevant about the ad. It is a come on to sell a $9.99 subscription to a service called ":Amazing Facts", which sends information to the customer's cell phone.

Any real national advertiser would look at the way the Obama search data is being used and take the Facebook ad salesman's phone number off of his speed dial. Procter & Gamble (PG) has been testing Facebook to see if it is a good medium for brand advertising. No one ever talks about results. The typical Facebook member either can't afford an expensive P&G Gillette razor or finds the ad so annoying that he will shoplift one the next time he is out to get back at P&G for disturbing his tranquility the last time he went online to visit one of his pathetic Facebook "friends."

Looking at Facebook through its dark side shows how inappropriate the site is for any real advertising. Search for the homepage of former genocidal dictator Idi Amin Dadi and the adjacent ads include one of a Gifts.com holiday gift card. It can be used at Gap (GPS), Barnes & Noble (BKS), or H&M. That certainly burnishes the gifts.com image.

Is It Surprising that P&G, Tide Struggle with Facebook Advertising?

In today's New York Times, Randall Stross dissects the world of brand advertising within social networks. Stross' article, Advertisers Face Hurdles on Social Networking Sites, delves into whether or not brands can scalably succeed on social networks (namely Facebook):

Brand advertisers on Facebook can try one of two new approaches. They can be more intrusive, but the outcome will not be positive. Or they can create genuinely entertaining commercials, but spend ungodly sums to do so.

When Facebook convinces advertisers to stage Super Bowl-sized entertainment every day, its future will be assured.

These are important questions, but they aren't necessarily the right ones. Rather, I'd ask:

- For what brands and verticals *does* advertising within social networks work? For instance, we know it works within music.

- At what cost does the advertising come? Is it measurable?

- What tactics are successful advertisers using? Are there 'black hat' behaviors and, if so, does that prevent certain brands / verticals from succeeding?

These questions are important because, despite Stross' well-written and researched article... it really shouldn't come as a surprise that P&G's Tide campaign doesn't work on Facebook. Do social networkers really want socialize around detergent? Even if they do - is that valuable for P&G?

Tide's failure on Facebook seems obvious. But I do not believe it suggests that brands cannot succeed on Facebook.... it may well be however that only brands within certain verticals can succeed until one of two things happen:

1. Facebook becomes more aggressive on the ad front (and it will) 2. The Tides of the world mask their ads behind more creative, sneaky efforts

The “America’s Favorite Stains” campaign, offered on Facebook by Procter & Gamble, asks for members’ ideas. It recently displayed 18 submissions.

Apple, iPod Touch Shake Up Yahoo Games Homepage

A few months ago, Nintendo and YouTube literally shook up the digital ad world with their Experiece the Wii ad/video. It's awesome. 4,500,000 video views aren't too shabby either. Today, Apple did something similar by running their iPod Touch ad on Yahoo Games front-door. It's the same ad that has been running on television for quite some time... but it behaves much like the Wii video: changing the rest of Yahoo's page as the iPod shifts, tilts, and so forth.

I love these ads - far more entertaining and interactive than traditional banner units. Again - the Wii video was viewed 4.5 million times and was discussed, shared and analyzed on countless blogs / sources.

The real questions are: - how difficult is it to produce these sorts of units and integrate them into the publisher's site? - consequently, how scalable does this become? - and what sorts of CPM lifts do they provide. If Yahoo typically fetches $5 CPMs for that size unit, is this $10? $20? $50?

iPod Touch Yahoo Ad iPod Touch Yahoo Ad iPod Touch Yahoo Ad

More at MacRumors - including the video

Nintendo Wii and Wii Fit Dominate eBay Shopping

TechCrunch posted this morning about the top tech gadgets as measured by eBay's top sales (always a good indication of macro-level trending and habits... one reason why I enjoyed working at eBay so much). Michael Arrington focuses mostly on the remaining popularity of the Nintendo Wii - which is stunning considering how its their second consecutive holiday season and so few games have been released.

Here are my thoughts:

- 83% of the top 15 items are video games. I've said it before: video games are a massive business

- 12% is mobile and the Blackberry Curve + Blackberry Pearl are bigger than the iPod 3G (clearly the price point and used market)

- Only two tech items are non-mobile / non-gaming: the iPod Touch (really surprised) and the MacBook Air

- The Wii Fit is amazing. More Wii Fits were sold than Playstation 3s and Guitar Hero IIIs combined.

- The drop off from the Nintendo Wii and Xbox360 is huge. The Wii sold 2mm+ items, the Xbox 1.3m and then next biggest item was 350k. Furthermore, the 15th item only sold 1,650 units

The Top 15 Tech Purchases Nintendo Wii: 2,056,866 related items sold Microsoft Xbox360: 1,297,903 related items sold Sony PSP: 350,591 related items sold iPod Touch: 281,361 related items sold Nintendo Wii Fit: 266,584 related items sold Apple iPhone 3G: 212,837 related items sold BlackBerry Pearl: 207,688 related items sold BlackBerry Curve: 193,788 related items sold Sony Playstation 3: 103,333 related items sold Guitar Hero III: 98,159 related items sold Halo 3: 91,067 related items sold Grand Theft Auto IV: 43,005 related items sold MacBook Air: 12,423 related items sold Guitar Hero Aerosmith: 3,749 related items sold Rock Band 2’s: 1,650 related items sold

Wii Fit Game Nintendo

Andy Azula, I Actually Like Your Latest Whiteboard Commercial

I've always been surprised by how much traffic my "Andy Azula - The Artist in the UPS ‘Whiteboard’ Commercials" blog post continues to drive. It's quite apparent that Andy Azula and his UPS commercials are quite polarizing. The commercials are now a year old and, for the most part, I find them remarkably annoying.

But like my surprising switch on ESPN.com's new Beta, I suppose I am able and allowed to switch my opinion of Andy Azula... I really like the latest commercial (embedded below). I am not sure how they do it, but the mixture of drawing to animation is seamless and really captures the point that UPS is trying to convey.

By the way - I also love the UPS video player. Very creative and well themed.

Widgetbox's New Partner Networks

Widgetbox has launched what we are billing as our Partner Networks platform. The Networks enable publishers of all sizes to rapidly create custom, branded widgets that merge content across multiple sources, authors and feeds. The widget is completely customizable and based on your author feed(s). Partners format the widget (size, layout, content, etc) and then manage the content via our 'membership console' (a tool to add, invite and organize the feeds displayed in the widget).

Partners also get branded hubs on Widgetbox.com. Those pages are also customizable and dynamically feature the network's widgets, members and headlines.

Below are examples of two Network Widgets - one from YouTube and one from Yardbarker. The widgets are below and a screenshot of the YouTube Network hub is then beneath that.

If you are interested in working with Widgetbox, please contact me directly. Whether you are an individual blogger or a major blogging platform, we have solutions!

YouTube Videos Network